Saturday, May 18, 2013

Chapter 3.5: Varun conducting market research on Chywanprash PLUS in Starbucks sans Summers


“Have a nice day!” the barista recommended to me, in a voice of maternal aspiration. I carried the steaming cappuccino back upstream of the multi-ethnic queue to find a seat among those who weren’t as paranoid as they should have been at how their laptops were literally screaming out loud - electromagnetically of course- their unencrypted data on Starbucks’ unsecured wifi network most likely sidejacked by adolescents who didn’t need to be begoggled hirsute grease-transuding computer-science majors to know the difference between http and https.

I’d ordered a wet cappuccino. Not the dry shit that some cost-cutting executive made default,  its ultra-light foam barely weighing the cup down during the most benign of zephyrs. You had to prefix your order with the word wet. Few loyalists knew this. Fewer convince themselves that knowing such a thing is what makes them different from all those superficial coffee consumers whose gustatory systems have been vestigialized by their “drink-don’t-think” instincts. I thankfully don’t belong to this snobbish subset, but can always pretend to be, which confuses me. How much of one’s life is pretense and how much genuine? Are they truly two different modus operandis? Are they necessarily opposites? Can one be the adjective of the other - genuine pretense or pretentious genuineness, in which case, are they inseparable? Then what about mens rea? Does it make sense to convict murderers who genuinely intend to inflict death but pretend to be innocent and not soldiers who pretend to intend to inflict death but are genuinely innocent? Maybe the problem is with language. “Murderer”, “Soldier”, “inflict” , “innocent”, “genuine”, “pretend” are words whose definitional spaces are overlapping, making it difficult to disentangle them and arrive at some truth. But if language is used to convey truth - no, reality - and language is so garbled, then reality should appear garbled too! But “reality” is also just another word, so I shouldn’t be too surprised if it’s likely to seem as garbled as any other concept, like “fiction”. So upon subtracting the garbling due to language, am I then left with reality’s inherent garbling? But there I go again, applying concepts like subtraction to things that defy any notion of quantity! What we’re left with then is Tarski’s inescapable theorem: “Snow is white if and only if snow is white.” Has humanity ever heard a more profound yet meaningless revelation? Here’s another one: the last line, the thundering conclusion, of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.” which achieves its full nihilistic force in German: “Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen.” This is the state of human understanding. Where reason dissolves in this plasm of absurdity. Like the sugar in my wet cappuccino.

The barista was clearly an undergrad, perhaps coping with some difficult concepts in the Arts and Humanities, judging from the cover of the book on the countertop which had grown a significant taper from spine to fore-edge from the absurd number of fluorescent yellow and pink post-its protruding like torchered tongues from the pages, titled “Poetry for Dummies”, its familiar cringe inducing shade of aureolin yellow , its alienating subtitle “A reference for the rest of us”, its wide-eyed lizard looking mascot pointing shamelessly at some promotional device like “for more, visit us at dummies.com”. The series of books began with one written for young enthusiastic DOS programmers at a time when computers didn’t belong in social settings. Apparently Hungry Minds Inc., now acquired by John Wiley & his Sons, are of the impression that the formula that makes engineering problems appetizing to the application oriented palate is the desired template for all subjects (“subjects” here refers not to various fields of study, but to the customers). This seemingly crackpot wishful thought is realized through a series of preceding paradigm altering marketing strategies: First make the customer feel more stupid than he/she originally feels by agreeing that his/her self-loathing is an authentic feeling that must be embraced and not corrected. Once the “dummy” is stuffed with a sufficient number of metaphorical saccharine lollipops and reassured that his/her feeling of entitlement to knowledge sans any serious work ethic is justified, proceed to distill concepts that took what is left of humanity generations to construct and refine, on the basis of publishing logistics like page limits, word limits, illustration limits and ultimately “average end user” limits. Upon adequately undermining “competing” authors and professionals (publish or perish remember?), climbing up the bookshelves by brutally, year after year, convincing students first in cities and then in an entire nation that their capacity to read “big books” is marginally better than a retarded child’s and that they shouldn’t shit themselves that they can actually grasp complex ideas independently, what with all the mass media having increased average endocrinal activity across the board. Encourage students to believe that everything (not just topics like fishing, carpentry, photography and combinatorics but interpreting Shakespeare, Heidegger, Heisenberg and Monet) can be understood if it were only presented properly, replacing the burden of learning with the burden of teaching. This should afflict a growing number of Professors with “teaching hypochondria”, debilitating them to take refuge in and learn from pop-culture so that more students don’t fill the feedback forms with “failed to make the class interesting”. The entire textbook industry has to get with the plan before they’re eliminated - effaced - from this life-size version of Monopoly. They reduce pages and increase font size, multiplying the number of books by the number of solipsistic character traits of the intended reader, flooding the market with the euphemistic Choice(TM). The academic inflation proceeds like a runaway chain reaction, gobbling up and delegitimizing the high standards of inquiry, and what once served as a gentle reminder of your stupidity is now a megalomaniacal institution founded on that single fact. Brace yourself, for you will soon witness an apocalyptic cultural impulse to know everything by doing nothing! Everything must be compressed, as lossily as possible, and delivered in between and alongside scheduled social gatherings and unscheduled social networking. Learning is now another form of entertainment, having inherited the nomenclature of advertisers (in all fairness, this needn’t have been the original intention of Arthur Nielsen). Good luck trying to deliver a compelling thought without the aid of a soundtrack, animation and a subscription package, all of which, incidentally, increase one’s arsenal to bullshit their way through life. Syllabi are truncated, TAs are hired and the job market is streamlined, now that the average college graduate is a lumbering mass of such astonishing stupor, conformity training isn’t even playfully considered as a worthwhile investment in “leading” corporations. So desensitized is he/she, that ideas like Democracy and Equality which are tectonically shifting right underneath his/her feet, fail to cause even the faintest of stirrings. But of course! Your ability to stand on your feet will determine if you can perceive the ground beneath you moving or shaking. But if you're dangling like a puppet in the hands of those who refuse to drop you, what strange meanings freedom, liberty and justice take?! Right to food isn't right to nutrition, its just right to food. Right to education isn't right to learning and questioning authority, its just right to education. Meaninglessness abounds because being philosophical, i.e. discerning, is what a drunk person is accused of when digressing from that ever-fecund topic of boobs & bums by raising some unnerving question on existence or purpose using an articulation broken and stunted by alcoholic incoherence. Orwell’s dystopia is nothing but a cheap horror film compared to DFW’s. The Dumminess that was all the while silently gaining market space has completed its transition to something far more impotent  and lethargic that even the puppet masters didn't foresee but are nonetheless rejoicing: Sheer Mass Dumbness.

And just as I was independently discovering the roots of Postmodernism, teetering on the cliff of sanity in an exhausting effort to distance myself as much as possible from the threatening imminence of a syllogistic avalanche, I heard a tune that restored my mind’s balance, at least temporarily, via appeal to my nostalgia, wafting through the caffeinated air in the usual way that Starbucks manages to make even the harsh acoustics of punk rock sound like white noise:

She...
She screams in silence
A sullen riot penetrating through her mind
Waiting for a sign
To smash the silence with the brick of self-control

I started pondering the relevance of the Green day lyrics to an ongoing exchange within earshot, between the barista and the next customer, apart from them both being girls.

Maybe the barista has little to no choice in the economic circumstances that made her pick up that book and not a compendium of World War I poetry which is the best place to start IMO if you want to experience the stomach-tightening amphetamine-like lyrics - written by articulate warriors thronging in bloodshed, longing for peace, of mind and nation (in that order) - that can erupt in one a feeling of Gestalt unique to one’s Erfahrung which mitotically splits into an incalculable Zustandsumme of perceptions that flagellate one’s mind into submission to this greater unknown wisdom and bestowing a sense of humility that textbook publishers couldn’t give half a rodent’s turd about, this realization never getting the chance to dawn on her fast lane life because of the bullshit she’s had to put up with since that time when some widowed art teacher told her her crayon drawing of her golden retriever resembled a horny capuchin monkey and that her talents would be better “harnessed" in learning an instrument, which she did, only to discover that she couldn’t concentrate on her finger-key coordination whether it was Beethoven’s Fur Elise or Billy Joel’s Piano Man because the piano was next to a goddamn window through which you could always see kids - orphans perhaps - playing on the lawn, the frustrated instructor having exhausted all her innovative teaching strategies including a glucose rich reward system, informs her parents that she had ADD, and like all those parents not one of whom suspected the window (or the glucose), they shovelled into their problem child’s pried open oral cavity adderall, ritalin and dexadrine in whimsical proportions until Mommy learnt how to use the internet and promptly stumbled upon webmd and/or a Tom Cruise interview that revealed to her that she could be killing her daughter with the bulldozer dosage, so she threw the pills and started consuming her own out of a self-inflicted depression arising from feelings of being an inadequate mother, thus spiralling out of self-control until her husband found her drug-riddled body one day laying on the bed naked with a cocaine moustache and “who-needs-boys-when-you-have-toys” toys, causing him to file for divorce, further contributing to their daughter’s disillusionment with the matrimonial institution of love, and later all semblances of love and similar romances, like Poetry, which she could never get even if she tried because most of her life had been the pursuit of things decided for her on her behalf, like the time when she felt that shoe-shopping was an empty headed excursion to the mall designed precisely by overrated fashion companies and their cold-blooded advertising minions to lure children away from the Library and into a world where stupid insecurities like the color of your skin, hair, shoes and nails would give rise to zombie consumerists who’d open their Lavender Lambskin leather handbags to pull out their Crimson Cowhide leather purses to pay for the latest fashion trends manufactured by WTO-protected cigar smoking CEOs like her presently-disowned-merely-biological father, all this she was scared to tell her bffs because they’d bully her and seduce her pussyclined bf in an act of teenage alienation which was too much for her to handle, worsened by her bf dumping her anyway for this chick who’s older and taller than him in a dominatrix kinda way that made her more anxious and insecure than ever before, driving her insane during a period wherein between being eiffel-towered by strict-protein-diet quarterbacks and cruelly speculating on the psychotic thrills in poisoning this year’s prom queen, a tiny voice inside her head (where the fuck else?) was gradually mustering the critical impulse load to get her to finally visit her now rehabilitated mother who responsibly advised her to join a Community College and get a degree in Literature or something for a fresh start, except that it would never be a fresh start without electroshock therapy and what comes next can only be worse but she’d do it anyway, yet Poetry could suck a bagodicks cause she had to make a living by working at a coffee shop serving random ungrateful judgemental strangers.
Like me.

Are you locked up in a world
That's been planned out for you?
Are you feeling like a social tool without a use?
Scream at me until my ears bleed
I'm taking heed just for you

Or maybe the barista was a senior scholar with no history of traumatic events, reviewing the book in an intellectually honest attempt to inform posterity to abstain from shallow simplistic works for sound Aristotelian reasons articulated in a disinterested yet stirring fashion.

Whatever it was, the Chinese girl on the other side of the counter couldn’t care less. She was clearly new to campus. And the English language.

Barista: Hey! How are you today?
Chinese girl: I’m wanna coffee.
Barista: Which one?
Chinese girl: One.
Barista: I’m sorry Mam. You need to pick a coffee.
Chinese girl (bringing her right index finger to the right side of her nose adorably): One.
Barista (vigorously gesticulating at the giant menu behind her- large fonts for beverage, small fonts for price, smallest drink is called a “tall” - which was suspended from the ceiling at an angle so as to optimize ease of viewing): You’ve got to PICK a drink on the menu.
Chinese girl (points at a not-to-scale picture on the menu of a steaming black liquid that resembled inviscid tar in a porcelain cup placed on a saucer that didn’t make much sense for coffee but looked pretty all the same, as though driving home the point that inanimate objects can look photogenic too): That!
Barista: I’m sorry Mam. But you have to tell me which one. I honestly can’t make this decision for you.

Why the flaming fuck was this barista increasing the complexity of her sentences when she was more than capable of understanding that the customer was a foreign student with a local-language-limitation? I momentarily thought of drilling a hole and tunneling this insensitive bitch through it and into a hypothetical PRC that had exchanged ideological roles with USA, where she’d have to pay for an overpriced education in a country that thinks or at least behaves like all other countries are inhabited by people who bathe in shit but since her own country can’t provide a decent education because of a restricted system that conflicts quite obviously with their undemocratic authoritarian tradition, she ends up being surrounded by people with different values, all of whom she reasonably expects to fathom the globalized world order and its inherent inconsistencies and injustices but is shocked to realize that she can’t find the most minimum of sympathies from even baristas (forget the customs officers) who address her in complicated Mandarin, a language she promised to the PRC government that she’d intended to learn during the time she’d spare herself when everyone else went clubbing and boozing in the weekends which gets her thinking about how fascinatingly different this culture really is and finds no compelling reason to hate it until this ignoramus barista’s limited imagination in what constitutes a universal cup of goddamn coffee assaults her perceptions of multiculturalism to the point where she’s trying to remember which finger it is that conveys the unholy trinity of insubordination, impatience and intolerance.

She...
She's figured out
All her doubts were someone else's point of view
Waking up this time
To smash the silence with the brick of self-control

Chinese girl (looks around helplessly and then strains with all her might): Regurrarr!
Barista: Will that be a tall or a grande?
Chinese girl (bringing her thumb and index finger together to indicate the word "small" hoping that this barista would not think she meant lobster): Smarr!
Barista: Ooookay! That’ll be one ninety five.

Chinese girl produces a one dollar note, three quarters and two dimes, balancing her turquoise colored purse between the palm, ring finger and pinky of her right hand with the other fingers designated to hold the sleeveless hot cup of coffee, maximizing the arm's neural flux, causing visible tremors in her shoulder that eventually caused her to drop the money which was in her left hand on the floor, so she bends over spilling the coffee on her crotch, Billie Joe Armstrong joining in the scream:

EHHHHHH,AHHHHHHHHHH!!!

I decided to walk outside. The stuff was wearing off.

Keep reading...

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

The Mother

Cristin Milioti.

That's all I ever wanted to know. Now I can skip the final season because the most important question has been answered.


Keep reading...

Sunday, May 12, 2013

Desensitization

The water has reached a roiling boil and the immaculate white mug is placed on its coaster on the dining table. There is no thought process involved; everything happens in an orchestrated flurry of movements. Two teaspoons of Maxwell House, hot water till the mug's half mark and a dabble of tepid milk. Two cubes of sugar. Stir well and imbibe. Bliss.

He reaches out for the plastic tongs and adds in the sugar cubes while the drone of the morning news fills the air of his cramped apartment like a miasma. The celebrity newsman prattles on inanely, occasionally demanding order and respect from his panelists who appear on his show only to further their sordid agendas in Parliament. Something about a neighboring country acting up again; fears about another trampling all over our sovereignty and concerns about our decadent moral core. What he'd like to call the Mass Media's wet dream. People are kept angry, fed with half-knowledge and allowed to act on their fears and bigotries. Where would these cretins be without the mayhem and chaos in our current social structure?

The first sugar cube has melted away but the second cube catches his attention. A black ant, with all the temerity that the Hymenoptera order could muster, sits on the dissolving second cube of sugar. A lone man on a lone island grabs onto the only coconut tree as the imaginary plug is pulled from underneath. Glug glug. At first, he studies the ant and gently prods the cube. The ant falls into the scalding beverage and were it capable of expressing emotions it would be screaming no doubt. No pity is offered, no pity is forthcoming. The spoon comes down without repent and the ant is consigned to the depths of the instant coffee.

An old memory is pulled up. At the water slide, he, as a young child, hesitates. The cries behind him get louder and harsher. Kids were unforgiving then too. Finally, with his back turned to the wall and with literally no other recourse, he goes down the slide and hits the pool after what feels like an eternity later. Before he gets his bearings together, David has followed suit and ploughs into his back, sending him deep underwater. The fear is overwhelming and the mind freezes. Arms flay and water invades the nasal crevices. Blindness and burning lungs. Panic and fleeting thoughts of death.

He finally disengages from auto-pilot and looks at the tainted metal spoon. He feels sick to his stomach. The room echoes with the crash of the ceramic mug on the mosaic floor and his screams telling the newsman to shut up. He glances at the black ant and wills with all of his might for the brave Hymenopteran to move.

Note: This is a work of fiction and no real ants were hurt in the writing of this post.

Keep reading...

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Reinterpretation

I could tell that they were working from the way the dance floor slowed down and the colors of the disco-lights were changing like those of the rainbow. Red was violet, blue was yellow and indigo was pink. Hold on, was pink in that list? “Never you mind” said the hippie in the corner. “Just give in to it. Don't fight it, accept it”. I pretended not to hear him and sat down heavily in the chair and I started to feel the colors. Michelle came back with the drinks and set them down on the table and handed me a cold one. Her beautiful face came into view and her lips came even closer. Contact. Colors exploded in my closed eyes and a rush of blood ensued. I withdrew breathlessly and she motioned to follow her outside. The jingle of her car keys was a good sign.

Back at her place, she dropped her keys on the rug and showed me around. Not that there was anything much to show around. There were buckets of crimson and white paint on the floor, a print of Le Chat Noir ready to be hung and a single futon with pristine white sheets in the corner. Michelle came back from the kitchen with a bottle of red wine; I could tell it was the cheap supermarket stuff even with the chemicals raging in my blood. I smiled and I accepted the glass and tilted it slowly back. She kept talking; an endless torrent of chatter. At some point the words stopped making sense. Her mouth slowed down at times and at other times it seemed like the words themselves took a form of their own. I sneaked a glance at her watch as she refilled my glass.
2 am.

I gratefully accepted the glass and pulled her down onto me. She laughed mirthfully and called me a drunk. She kissed me deeply and sank onto her futon and without another word slumbered into a deep sleep. The wine didn't go well with the stuff the hippie had offered. My stomach lurched and I half-stumbled to the newly finished bathroom and cradled the toilet as my body heaved. Back and forth. I flushed and then collapsed into the tub. I've never slept with the lights on, but this night was the exception.

A stream of sunlight woke me up in the morning and I found a handwritten note on my person. I squinted and read it. “Sorry, I didn't quite get your name...Stacey was it? I have work to get to. Last night was certainly interesting. There's some leftover salad and mash in the fridge if you are game. I think you can find your way back home, yeah?
I crawled out of the bathtub and walked out into the hall. Without thinking I took a swig of the wine from last night's bottle. I looked around and noted for the first time, the wooden panels leading to the kitchen. I looked at the bottle of alcohol in my hand. And I noted the lighter and pack of cigarettes near Michelle's futon. My eyes darted back to the bottle and then the lighter.

The hippie in the corner confirmed what I had been thinking all along. “Yep, Norwegian Wood.”

Keep reading...

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Chapter 3: Campus

“Fuck!” I yelped, as the large dusty cardboard box came crashing down on my knuckles with a censoring thud. The miniature gyroscope inside could be heard clattering against what was surely the polished plate belonging to an Euler’s disk, to my relief, as it could have easily been bar magnets shattering the glass of a plasma ball, which ought to have been accompanied by a distinct pop due to air violently invading the privacy of low pressure argon. It was a box of physics toys that Summers left behind along with an assortment of papers, stationery, books and a wizened old Thinkpad which looked like it could use an armchair and a fireside.

I played along with the other graduate students’ belief that he would walk in some day and casually open up his terminals, plug on his earphones (through which, I was certain, no music was ever playing) and script in different syntaxes that showed in the psychedelic colors of VIM, as though his absence was due to some acknowledged sabbatical or internship. And here we are, after a year, finally getting over Summers’ departure. Why he left these behind is a greater mystery than why he left. That was obvious. You know that feeling- when a party reaches that tedious staleness after the first few two beers, when conversations resemble the voidness of the speakers’ thoughts ever more vividly, when everyone is rushing for refills and veiling their life’s longings in barefaced consumption, when the interesting people exit for a smoke to exhale their disgust without speaking it, when the music, however thumping and tribal, fails at stirring a semblance of celebration, almost like a religion’s dwindling appeal - however much this puts one into a fantod, it would be impolite to just get up and leave with a silly excuse; that would be an overt “fuck you!” to anyone with just the right amount of intelligence to see through the lie, but just the wrong amount to think that this party needed them. Summers got himself fired by the Department instead.

The box also contained a blunted walkalong glider, a faded pair of nontransitive dice, a crumpled paper with drawings of either a flute or a Ruben’s tube, a scientific calculator incapable of matrix operations and a plastic folder thick with pages of various widths labeled “Delightful Tangents”. The afternoon Californian blaze poured through the single hung windows to illuminate the Brownian motion of the dust that I blew off the surface of the folder. It contained printouts of various articles in painfully low dpi: “The soul of a man under Socialism” by Oscar Wilde, “Copyleft: Pragmatic Idealism” by Richard Stallman, “E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction” by DFW, a series of chapters from John Hopcroft’s “Formal Language and their relation to automata” and a bunch of others in subjects of sociology, psychology and - what would have been a curiosity a year ago but not anymore - high energy physics abstracts from the parody journal snarXiv. Interspersed in these were his own scribblings, mostly equations in which there were more subscripts than variables, qualitative inequalities like “Orange > Apple” “Cauchy-Schwarz > all other inequalities” “stdout > filename” and doodles of colliding vortices connected by Feynman’s wiggly arrows. I pulled out a stapled set of sheets and read:


Harmony of the Hypotenuse
by Nathaniel Summers

A point by itself is unvivid and boring, like the banter of businessmen and wives,

Impotent it isn’t, upon infinitesimal thought, how else can one construct lines?
Straight as usual, not necessarily you say, but lets dignify postulate five,
Three rightly placed yields a singular hypotenuse, prejudiced to orthogonal sides.

Their relationship is a simple one, so claim the bitter, unloved headmasters,

“Forget it and starve to death,” they pronounce, among other disasters,
“Spare the sturdiest pillars for logic, leave others their gilded pilasters!”
Of philosophical proofs they were teaching, to a classroom of young poetasters.

No experiment compels sufficiency, unnecessary is the cry for application,

Proving here comes from neither of these, to be brave is to be a mathematician,
To call axioms assumptions and postulates hypotheses is a sign of utter conflation,
Math outranks your pedestrian truth, get out if you need verification!

A multitude of proofs this theorem boasts, popularly algebraic and geometric,

Loomis shows three-seventy of these, including dynamic and quaternionic,
He ridicules the exclusions, and rightly so, where’s logic in those trigonometric?
Sine and Cos come from the right angle triangle, not some principle anthropic.

The first recorded survey goes back three thousand years, if we give or take a few,

An exemplary product of Babylonian inquiry, as shown on Plimpton three-twenty-two,
When civilization renounced her umbilical connections, in the ancient city of Eridu,
In glyphs of Sumerian, these sexagesimal triples, graced us with our first clue.

The premier formalism is owed to the bright mammals, across the Corinthian isthmus,

At a time when Homer laid claim on their souls, through his mighty Odysseus,
And half a millennium before the miserable and illiterate, following of Christ Jesus,
The foundations of mathematics were first uttered, by the elites of celebrated Pythagoras!

Although his writings aren’t extant, his oral tradition we shall reproduce,

“Within a square of side ‘a’ plus ‘b’, sit four triangles hardly abstruse,
They share those sides with a slope ‘c’, rearrange twice and you shall deduce,
that ‘a’ squared and ‘b’ squared in sum equal ‘c’ squared, without a deuce of an excuse!”

Its these simple profundities that reveal immensely, the beauty of thought to my heart,

What a difference intelligence makes, how it places us human beings apart!
Unraveled was the edifice of geometry, the plans were drawn for Descartes,
“Cogito Ergo Sum!”,  he said, need we ever remind ourselves we’re smart?

Before I sink into romantic quicksand, I wish to complete this shabby presentation,

Of the theorem’s glorious proofs and history, onto Euclid’s colossal assimilation!
Different from Mendeleev’s but as fundamental, these Elements - the building blocks of creation!
Book 1 defines points, lines, congruence, triangles unto the 47th proposition!

This proof is longer than the previous graphical, but lets not mangle beauty,

To read the axioms and common notions, and the definitions is our implicit duty,
Your sincerity’s reward is a cerebral revelation, of mankind’s most valuable booty,
Lo and behold this arresting emergence, an ensemble of propositions in tutti!

For fools who choose to be mathematically homeless, I wouldn’t mollify your despair,

But remember that a triangle between parallels, whose gram its base does share,
Is equal to half the gram in area, with absolutely no change to spare,
Right this triangle and proceed bravely, if ever this proof you dare!

Jefferson and Franklin opened with Euclid, “We hold these truths to be self evident”

Orwell insisted this declaration unmalleable, so did our sixteenth president,
There exists a proof by his fellow Republican, later a White House resident,
A time when our leaders were mentally faceted, and in matters of triangles not reticent.

Garfield the twentieth prez began, by first splitting a trapezoid in three,

The areas of which add up to its whole, to this fact we’re compelled to agree,
Since each of these figures possess a different base - a construction prima facie,
The equality follows with the most minimal effort, no need a doctorate degree.

May your curiosity voyage the Pacific, and reveal the glorious Eastern fecund,

Break yourself from the shackles of hubris, to others too knowledge beckoned,
Zhou Bi (Suan Jing) of one hundred BCE, had with a geometric proof reckoned, 
Thirteen centuries onward Ujjain blessed us, with the Leviathan Bhaskara the second.

Of all the above this is most artistic, it makes for a pleasing rangoli motif,

Lay the shorter base of one upon, the hypotenuse of another for relief,
Do this with four to enclose a square, for effect deliver on your handkerchief,
Impress your friends with the straightforward equality, in beauty restore their belief!

But if you lack friends, I implore you not fear, now is not the time to mope,

For you there is reason, and an intelligent soul, with mathematics you must elope,
With her go forth and erect the fortresses, of civilization’s ultimate hope,
Let illogic be the downfall of your enemies, let them tumble down their slippery slope.

The reason Summers was fired is a secret only the Department higher-ups and I were privy to. Simply put, he had automated his entire research. Not just the Data Acquisition or the Direct Numerical Simulations. From framing the problem statement to arriving at the conclusions, everything was coded in python wrapped c++. Our lab specializes in turbulent flows over bluff bodies, so much that we’ve been conferred the vulgar slogan “You give us a bluff body, and we’ll give you a turbulent flow.” This “Industrial Empiricism on Steroids”- quoting Summers - prompted his rapid disillusionment in the pursuit of his PhD within the first six months of his recruitment. To preserve the idea of using his brain, he began his own private programming exercise. The consecrated Scientific method of breaking a complex physical phenomenon down to study the relationship between its relevant variables had now been perverted into figuring out how plausible relationships yielded sentences like “If X is greater/less than the threshold frequency Y, then Z increases/decreases by an/ALPHA order/s of magnitude.” Depending on the results of the experiments and simulations, more sentences like “Turbulence model K predicts within-reasonable-accuracy/wrongly the observed power spectrum  L” were tailored. Such examples constitute a well known branch in formal language theory called context-free grammar wherein sentences can be constructed from simple mathematical statements like equalities, inequalities,implications, etc. One can get away with Summers’ “academic murder” particularly in fields that lack rigorous standards for apparatuses (low tolerance “controlled” environments such as in our “Facility”), which make for a discourse mired in conflicts independent of any meaningful furtherment of fundamental knowledge, where the contest between claims gains self-fulfilled legitimacy because not one single group possesses the mature balance between technology and scholarship. Once the relevant data sets were acquired and non-arbitrarily deemed sufficient, Summers’ code would simply brute-force compare various permutations, utilizing the University’s High Performance Computing Center’s Terabytes of storage and TeraFLOPS of speed, iterating through multi-dimensioned arrays of TeraCRAP, until the elusive set of patterns emerged as a palpable fabric of binary brocade. These were then translated to mathematical formalisms and passed through a series of linguistic checks to be further translated to context-free English.The resulting set of unambiguous but semantically incoherent statements, written in familiar academic argot, were iteratively refined to weed out recognizable traits of postmodernisms by comparing the generated sentences to those parsed from contemporary literature through a script wordplayfully titled “muspeak.py” after Orwell’s throttlingly unambiguous Newspeak and the symbol for dynamic viscosity in fluid mechanics. And since today’s attention deficit peer-reviewing standards allow research groups to publish data with just about any sloppy hand-waving explanation chaperoned by a citation to another group’s marginally better reasoning, Summers - or rather his code - had to once again simply parse relevant papers, pooled from a trivial keyword web-crawl (that Google hands on a platter viz. Scholar), for sentences that either supported or rejected his findings. These ingredients, iced with pretty contour plots and an inscrutably conclusive summary, were sufficient for publishing a paper in the Journal of Advanced Fluid Mechanics, in Summers’ case titled “The effects of percussive perturbations on the shedding frequencies of isotropic vortices.” The paper was accepted and even lauded for its “precise delineation of the relevant phenomena” by eminent scholars at Princeton and Stanford! Summers went on to publish two more; “High Weber number shearing at critical Pressure and Temperature” and “Criteria for Transonic boundary layer tripping on the NACA 0012 airfoil” in the following months,  passing the Turing test with flying colors. It was only after the third that he revealed to me, one alcohol-fueled night, what the solitary desktop icons “automate_papers.py” and “muspeak.py” on his computer were all about, leaving me face-palming with a “2+2= what else could it be?” level of force. He could have wrapped up his defense in similar fashion but instead, as if a savage dining on barbecued-academic-institutions wasn’t enough, for his postprandial moral intercourse a.k.a. kicks for dicks, he sent JAFM a letter of mockery stating that their standards were “deleterious to Science” and “couldn’t possibly warrant $31 a paper”. This damning rebuke whirlwinded him straight into the Dean’s office where he was asked to quit the PhD program with immediacy, but was offered a position in IT that paid him double to keep his mouth shut. He took it. I still work here.


I rearranged the papers and slid them back into the folder feeling an absurd sense of restoration- does he not care about this crap anymore?

It was 2 pm and I’d developed a craving for coffee. “Anyone for a cuppa coffee?”, I asked with no actual intention of hanging out with the same people I would eventually return to work with. “Just had one at Lunch” said Cory, excitedly minimizing a dense excel sheet and opening up his browser to render facebook, tacitly and/or subconsciously justifying the cue for break time. “Naaaaah,” brayed Alessandro who was hiding a Neapolitan smirk behind a copy of “People”-it was hard to tell if Jennifer Aniston’s nose was a result of another septoplasty or a photoshop airbrush. Alessandro once shared an interesting theory on how Italian laziness shows up even in their coffee brewing tradition: “You see the Frainche use-a the forced steam to-a brew thee coffee. We use-a thee gravity.” Ping paused his Massively-Multiplayer-Online-Role-Playing-Lacanian-Unconscious-Sex & Violence-Satiating-Game to turn around on his black-sweat-soaked-fart-adsorbing-bacterially-decomposing-leather chair and raise his right middle finger high over his rectangular head with an expression which would have looked menacing if he were in control of the narrowness of his eyes. Poor Ping was always made fun of because of his low alcohol tolerance, evangelism for state capitalism, loyalty to Panda Express and unbelievable lack of talent at table-tennis. And he didn’t drink coffee.

“Well fuck you guys. I’m getting a coffee!”

The vestibule to the elevator was flanked by doors on either side, with the leading pairs belonging to the richer groups that fired lasers from one to the other either for velocimetry or for chemical diagnostics or as a security system to alert the others of an incoming advisor. Not out of the fear of being fired on grounds of fucking around - PhD students are known for their stoicism- they were compensating for the shenanigans they missed out in school. Although that is visibly changing. Now the incoming candidates enter with full fledged lives - they snowboard, ride fast cars, go on dates (with an emphasis on the plural), have more than three friends in real life, pay attention to College sports, organize poker nights, swear by smart phones, work strictly from nine to five, spend hours in the gym fine tuning the appearances of their biceps and triceps and quadriceps and glutes, watch late night TV, take month long vacations, treat their pay as hard earned and go to office hours. Or maybe its just the West Coast.

The elevator doors opened to reveal a group of overconfident good looking undergraduates who’d formed a study group after their Thermodynamics instructor insisted that teamwork and brainstorming were excellent ways to grasp the subject matter. They were here to bribe Ping into giving them the answers to this week’s assignment on ‘Rubberband engines and Carnot bicycles’ by inviting him to the weekend’s fraternity parties where they would promise him more than just free drinks. It goes without saying that Alessandro would be invited too, at least by the girls. Cory didn’t like parties, but would go anyway. I got onto the platform and pressed “1” which should have rightly been zero. I checked to see if the ironic notice plate had been replaced. It hadn’t: “If this elevator for some reason stops, don’t panic. Press the Panic button below.”

It was a bright Summer’s day with no cover except for a single contrail that had grown Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities diffusing outwards like a growing series of tsunamis. You could tell it was a working day by the number and kind of bikes parked outside the Central Library: white kids’ chopper aspiring beach cruisers were mostly absent on Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights and the rest were utility bikes that were typically fewer in number only in the wee hours of Monday morning when assignment deadlines expired and gave birth to new ones. The Central Library served as a symbolic representation of the social hierarchy. The basement housed a very large scale integration of Indian and Chinese electrical engineers who professedly work well under pressure, which is ipso facto the promise of bountiful pleasure. The top floor was for rich seniors who sat on sofas with feet outstretched on ottomans, macbooks on their laps, gazing out their windows momentarily distracted by the incomprehensible futility of their existence, the glowing pale white monochrome half-bitten apples on the backsides of their LCDs unflinching and unforgiving in this or any other philosophical investigation. Undergraduate girls who wore sunglasses that weighed more than the rest of their clothing, lay sunbathing on the lawn, their shock absorbing breasts pressed against the drying grass, deprived of their photosynthesis, and their boyfriends rubbing sunscreen about their lumbars tracing cardioids with the heels of their palms while sporting a look of pathetically blatant concupiscence. An all girl acapella group found itself surrounded by onlookers while rehearsing for the upcoming All American Intercollegiate Acapella World Championships. Two obese twenty year olds clapped their elephantine hands, slapping thick layers of accumulated jiggling fat to a rhythm they were beatboxing in a low register. The other two girls were the foci of everyone’s ogling. One showed off a generous surface area of cleavage fanned out by a decollete neckline, the sunlight adjusting the shine of her flowing red hair as she swayed her head in a kind of two-dimensional normal mode while singing in an angelic voice, her lips thin and taut with arousing wildness. The other, equally pulchritudinous and endowed, her bright brown eyes catching the sight of my Adam’s apple rematerializing upon soaking up her callipygian contours, accentuated by a tantalizingly thin translucent skirt which was in a shade of gray that I can best describe as F0F0F0 in rgb hexcode. Their beauty played in concert with their masterful superposition of octaves,delivering a breathless vocal cadenza foreign to the autotune exploits of every other schmuck with a hairstyle and a record label.

Windmill, windmill for the land.
Turn forever hand in hand
Take it all in on your stride
It is stinking, falling down
Love forever love is free
Let's turn forever you and me
Windmill, windmill for the land
Is everybody in?”

It was an unfamiliar acoustic-like rendition of Gorillaz’ electronic hip-hop single “Feel Good Inc.” Everyone clapped and joined in the chorus, but how many, I wondered, could place the reference to Orwell’s windmill? This song is as subversive a take on today’s aspirations for a socialistic utopia as Animal Farm was when it first came out in 1945. There’s a book I dare Disney to plagiarize. They couldn’t even if they wanted to anymore. Too busy rewriting Spiderman’s love triangle or curbing Luke Skywalker’s incestual proclivities in an attempt at parenting their audience - an audience that can’t read or has ever perceived of a need that precedes their creed and causes them to cede the high steeds on which they speak of greed like a child who pleads for more and more until it succeeds and settles for thoughtless speed that breeds stupor in a mind unfreed and unsheathed to the bullshit that misleads ephebes, stampedes the buried values underneath souls which bleed in a silence that exceeds the torture of Hades so they proceed to scrawl a melancholy screed in the parentheses of our deeds which alas, no one will ever read.
Varun calm the fuck down. Have some Chyawanprash. Take it easy.

I pulled out from the crowd and headed towards the StarBucks which was attached to the side of the library like some sort of symbiotic tumor. I had scheduled to meet Summers there to give him my latest batch of Chyawanprash. Chyawanprash is the brand name of a popular Indian laxative which was also now the codename for a form of esculent marijuana prepared for students on campus (exclusively by me) who suffered from pleurisy but still wished to get high, basically made of sugar, cocoa, milk, vanilla and varying grades and molalities of marijuana depending on the customers, who I’m told know best. The name is accidental; when I first got into the racket, I found myself running out of containers so I emptied one of the many of my roommate’s dabbas and repacked it with what looked indistinguishable from the original contents. (Many pranks were played indeed with little sympathy for my roommate’s dyspepsia) The name stuck because of various reasons, the most significant among which was its instant appeal to hipsters.

Summers’ Aqualung figure was immediately discernible among a sea of Starbucks Loyalists, sipping coffee and playing with a cigarette between his fingers. “Varun! Over here!” he called, overemphasizing the alveolar trill in my name. “Hey!” I replied and sat opposite his shabby person.


“Did you bring the stuff?”
“Yeah.” I pulled it out of my jacket’s underside and handed it over to him without a fuss.
“All point zero zero zero one kilograms?”
I took a couple of seconds. “Yeah. Thats three on your tab so far.”
“Sure. So, tell me something mind-blowing” he demanded, pocketing the dabba.
“I’m fresh out of mind TNT.”
“Not even a little dyna-mind?”
“Did you know that the sleeve of your Cappuccino could save a hundred thousand trees?”
“This single sleeve?”
“Well, not by itself. But you endorse the idea.”
“Would they let me endorse some other ideas?”
“...”
“These self-righteous capitalist....raptors!”

It was very difficult of late to discuss anything with Summers without it degenerating into a diatribe on capitalism. It was his new thing. But maybe that is the nature of our generation’s impediments. I couldn’t let that come in the way of the career advice I was about to ask of him.

“Professor Krauss believes that Science teachers should be paid more.”
“Why on Earth?”
O-Oh. “To incentivize a Scientific upbringing.”
“Professor Krauss, with due respect, is punching way over his weight. He thinks that by paying Science teachers more, more people will wish to teach Science and hence more people will learn Science. Tell me Varun, are you seriously asking me this?”
“Well, yeah. It is a popular economic model.”
“You present yourself a strawman.”
“...”
“You see the flaw in the argument. Money can’t buy certain things. No matter how much you offer to pay Science teachers, the thing that inspires one to pursue Science can never be shaken - Curiosity. Krauss thinks he can inspire people to be curious by luring them with money? How does one look at a butterfly and remind themselves to ask questions of the light interference from the wings, or its bizarre metamorphosis upon conjuring up the thought of a luxurious future. Many ideas have gone down in history with the reputation of the excreta of a Rhinoceros. This is I hope is one of them.”
“Somehow, I’ve lost my craving for coffee.”
“Idiot. Him I mean.”
“He did say it was a controversial idea.”
“I think he believes it. It comes from his militant atheism, this idea.”
“Surely you are a militant atheist yourself?”
“For different reasons, not the least of which comes close to the otiose Republican imagination of his.”
“Then how do we improve Science education?”
“What is this vulgar urgency for improving Science education? This distracts from a more entrenched problem in our Society.”
“Class struggle?”
“You complete me.”
“I have to go.”
“Next week same time?”
“Same place. And by the way, you’ve left a bunch of stuff back at the lab.”
“And?”
“Don’t you want it back?”
“No.”
“Why not?”
“Let some junior stumble on it and put the pieces together and revelate. I will be needing some self-learned younglings in the future.”
“Later.”
“Later.”

I walked away empty handed and uncaffeinated. Summers had sealed a fate that was incontestable to him while I was here grappling with Life pulling the rug from right underneath me. Research was shit. Teaching was shit. Food was shit. Colleagues were shit. People in general were turning into Non-Newtonian goops of shit. All I had was my Chyawanprash hustling and some incoherent ideas and misplaced affections.

I returned to the lab to find everyone exactly how I’d left them. I opened up my browser and did something I was sure I would regret for a long time, but as Zizek says, “Why be happy when you can be interesting?” I began to type in Gmail mustering all the genteelisms I could recall:

“Professor,
After much deliberation and insomnia, I’ve come to the rather difficult decision of resigning from your establishment. This may come as a surprise, but I assure you that I’ve given this much thought and feel that I have no more time to lose. Where to shed this saved time I have not figured out yet, but.....”

I felt stupid at this point, stopped typing and closed the fucking thing, dejected at the strength of my convictions. Just then an alarm went off.
“Professor incoming!” shouted Ping. Cory deftly restored his desktop and Alessandro flung the magazine in my direction. I grabbed it and sat on it, feigned a casual disposition and whispered under my breath, “Just a little longer.”

Keep reading...

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Star Wars just isn't for me

There are several movies and television shows that have inspired a mind-bogglingly large fan-base. Examples would include Star Trek, Buffy the Vampire Slayer and perhaps The Godfather. And of course, Star Wars. Star Wars is such a vast universe with the philosophy of the Jedi spilling into real life, there are websites that actually talk about the order in which to show these films to their children. There are debates about "Han Shot First", "The Nature of the Dark Side" and of course the revelation of Luke's parentage. So what's my opinion on Star Wars? I hadn't seen Star Wars until yesterday. Shocking, yes. How is it possible you might ask that a child of the late eighties hadn't watched The Phantom Menace, The Clone Wars and The Revenge of the Sith? How could I have not have not heard of the Force- the field that penetrates all of the land, the water and sky? Well, believe me; I'd watched Star Wars and while I respect the imagination and the special effects, some details are hard to overlook. I'll mention a few; some of them are quibbles on my end and not really faults per se.

1. Chronology: The events describing the Death Star, Luke and Han Solo are filmed first and the events describing Anakin's life come thirty odd years later. So, CGI Yoda, awesome lightsabre battles in vivid colors take chronological precedence to the papier-mâché looking Yoda puppet. Although this is a genius move, it makes the series a little difficult to grasp, given our mindset that chronology follows filming order.

2. Philosophy: The Light and Dark Side of the Force seems to be representative of the war between good and evil. Is the Force itself a neutral entity and our thoughts alone shape the nature of its manifestation? I find that to be a good icebreaker, but otherwise the Force may be overly depended upon to explain the nature of the Sith and the Jedi. The Force can also manipulate objects, weak minds and turn people into Electro can manifest itself as Force lightning. The Force can even be sensed so acutely by Jedis that a killer worm in a sleeping woman's quarters can be detected while the Jedis are jesting about the weather. Right.

3. The dialogues: If I hear "Search your feelings; you know this to be true" one more time, I am going to rage flip a table. So Darth Vader was told by Darth Sidious that Luke was his son. Darth Vader rightly asks for evidence...you know, a Jedi Parentage test, a sampling of Luke's Force signature...anything at all. But Sidious asks Vader to search his feelings. And in an instant Vader is like "Oh yeah, Luke's my kid." Lazy writing or not, Vader employs the same approach on Luke. Evidence? Oh no, just search your feelings, Luke, and you'll realize this.

4. The acting: I don't know about the other fans out there, but I think there was absolutely no chemistry between the actors portraying Anakin and Padme. Not to mention, I was creeped out by Anakin's wooing. Heck, even Padme asked him not to look at her in a way and he stills looks creepily at her. The two of them discussing Padme's baby while standing at the terrace is one of the most loveless scenes I've ever witnessed in a movie.

5. Lolwat? moments: Anakin attempts a Yoda flip and gets de-limbed. Then he spontaneously combusts. So the whole while while they were battling inches away from lava, they're fine, but once they stop, they burst into flames? The prophecy: Oh god, why must every storyline have a prophecy with a saviour in it? He who will save us from the Sith and bring balance to the Force. He who will be born in September and will defeat the Dark Lord. He who will save Zion. Pretty much the attempt to fulfill the destiny fucks it up. Anakin tries to save Padme from Death and negates the prophecy. Voldemort tries to fulfil the prophecy by killing Harry and he dies instead. Neo chooses to save Trinity and sacrifice Zion. And one thing that really bothers me: when technology is so advanced that they can save a severely burnt, amputated Sith and bring him back as Vader, why can't medical technology do anything to save Padme? Don't tell me...she chose not to live? Please. Here's another: if a Jedi can talk with dead people and literally seek advice from them as if they are still around (Luke pleading with Obi-Wan's ghost during Empire Strikes Back), why can't Anakin simply use the Force to chat with Padme's ghost? Even the threat of death would not sever them; he can use the Force! And speaking of bringing balance to the Force: if the Jedi outnumber the Sith, theoretically, isn't the Force abundant in Light side than in Dark Side?

Of course, sci-fi cannot be completely dissected because that would take the fun out of watching it. I'm not going to say that no one can hear a damn thing in outer space. But sometimes poor choices in dialogue, bad acting and lapses in logic can ruin a movie viewing experience. I understand fully well that the series is a bold and exciting visual treat and credit is given where it's due for its in-universe characters, but for me, finally watching the series left much to be desired.

Keep reading...

Friday, March 15, 2013

Google Reader to be unplugged in July

It was a long time ago and I recall being at Vyaas' place and the one thing I remember particularly well were the multiple desktops (or workspaces) on his Ubuntu installation. I would like to emphasize that if Past Nikhil were ever to have seen a feat of technology that breached upon the forbidden realm of Heaven, it was definitely multiple desktops and executing scripts without a GUI. I'll make an additional admission: then, I still checked my email using a browser and I had no clue about RSS feeds.

While I figured out Thunderbird (and later, Zimbra Desktop) on my own, I still visited websites on a regular basis to see if something new had showed up.
So, I used to open up Firefox, type out the address or call it from a bookmark, visit the site and check for new content. Vyaas literally blew a fuse when he heard about this. He then taught me about Google Reader and I was hooked. I ended up subscribing to over 80 feeds: anime blogs, web comics, science articles, political podcasts and so much more. RSS feeds now became something akin to email; log in, check and log out. What's more, Google Reader had in-window audio players, so I didn't have to visit the website hosting the content at all! Of course, some things have to come to an end...

Google has announced that they will be putting Reader to pasture in July.

"There are two simple reasons for this: usage of Google Reader has declined, and as a company we’re pouring all of our energy into fewer products. We think that kind of focus will make for a better user experience."

It's a decision that has ticked me off, to be honest. It is a truly unique service and not a copy-cat, me-too!! service like what Google+ is. These days, everybody wants in on the social media craze and I'm sure that Google assumes that their Google+ experience is going to be the Facebook killer. This is not uncommon these days where services are suspended and decisions are made with no regard to the opinion of the userbase or the community (*cough, Ubuntu,*cough). Google is free to make their decisions and to call the shots, but by doing so, they risk angering the consumer base. The Der Untergang video sums it up nicely.




But for now, I have to export my existing feeds as an XML file and look for alternatives. I'm on Linux too, so Feed Demon is out of the question. Sigh.

Update: Feed Demon is dead too? Noooo!!!

Keep reading...

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

No guards to hear you scream

I reckon it's human psychology to express curiosity for phenomenon that deviate from the ordinary. And when it comes to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, better known as North Korea, curiosity can take on morbid tones. The reason isn't difficult to pin down: it's dubbed as the Hermit Kingdom and is culturally, technologically and philosophically different from any other country on the planet. The history and achievements of its dictators have been fabricated, their personalities elevated to a godliness and it is perhaps the only country where a dictatorship has been inherited and a dead man is their Supreme Leader. George Orwell, for all we know, could have had a prophetic vision of North Korea in 1948 that set the standards for dystopia: denial and manipulation of information, cultural and social isolation, racist ideologies, the starvation of the proletariat and a blatant disregard of national priorities. Hitchens comparison of Heaven to North Korea isn't too off the mark either: the idea of compulsory love, where the believer has to love and fear his maker. It's Hell for the blasphemer and the gulags for the dissenter-- the latter being worse than any Hell imaginable.

The situation has mutated into a scenario where there is no way out. The masses of the North Korean peninsula have been brainwashed and coerced into buying the cock and bull story that their country is to be envied and that their leaders are demi-gods. The country has been ruled with an iron fist where bureaucracy and corruption is rife and human rights are non-existent. Their ideology of self-reliance (Juche) is a farce since they are forced to accept foreign aid. Even if the State dissolves voluntarily or through military intervention from the West, the financial woes faced by South Korea into annexing a nutritionally, economically and ideologically different North is terrifying. Top it all off, the South's policy of non-aggression through the Sunshine Policy was considered a failure three years ago.

Now, we have Dennis Rodman in North Korea, enjoying a basketball game with the current dictator and calling him a "friend for life". Rodman's ignorance of the geo-political landscape is clearly evident as he tweeted that he hoped to run into PSY (of Gungnam Style fame) while he was in Pyongyang. While some Americans laud this act as a diplomatic ice-breaker, others have been more harsh on this move. Sending an eccentric basketball player who was paid an undisclosed amount by Vice TV to engage a dictator guilty of human rights violations, just to get a television show on HBO is irresponsible and baleful. While thousands languish in the Soviet-styled gulags, starved, tortured (think spinal rearrangement) and punished for seeking a better income or for learning the truth about their warped reality from pirate stations in South Korea, it is vile that a man is wined and dined by a dictatorship that is responsible for killing its own citizens during the Arduous March
All for the consumption by the morbidly curious masses on their LCD screens.
 

Note: The title of the post is part of a quote by Jung Kwang Il who escaped in 2004. Read his story here.

Keep reading...

Friday, February 22, 2013

Sirens of the past


The condemnation to repeat the past is not limited to those who forget it, as George Santayana had warned, but extends to those who remember it as well, for this selective amnesia is dangerously institutional. When our political propaganda displays not even the most superficial self-respect while spouting Nehru-Mountbatten conspiracy theories and Indus-Vedic clericism, when our history teachers bulldoze forensics with facts and figures, when historians like Romila Thapar are pilloried and demagogues like Subramaniam Swamy are celebrated, one can readily be considered naive, if not dramatic, if he/she fell off their chair in shock! The earnest can at best raise their voice to those high inaudible pitches while the disinterested are content to meekly concede to incremental “progress”.

The overdue return of History to the Humanities from the Social Sciences would go a long way in resurrecting the past alongside its many struggles, material or ideological. The style of narrative history (effectively employed by such eloquent writers as Ramachandra Guha and William Dalrymple) compels readers to juxtapose past with present while challenging them to discern differences besides that distinction. I shall present an example to illustrate the exercise:

Utilize the full range of your imagination to recreate an Indian Courthouse in the city of Ahmedabad on March 23rd, 1922, in which Mohandas Gandhi has just been sentenced for sedition; the incriminating articles in question were those that appeared in Young India, critical of the malfeasance of the British Raj. The audience comprise all sorts from the marginalized lower castes to the highest British nobility, their perspiration either a result of anxiety or ineffective ceiling fans. Gandhi is offered a final statement in an act of imperial generosity. His opening lines must have sounded surprisingly apologetic to patriot and prince alike:

“Before I read this statement I would like to state that I entirely endorse the learned Advocate-General’s remarks in connection with my humble self...it is very true and I have no desire whatsoever to conceal from this court the fact that to preach disaffection towards the existing system of Government has become almost a passion with me...I knew that I was playing with fire.”

We’re off to the races! Section 124A is still enshrined in our constitution despite the admonition of Jawaharlal Nehru in 1951: “Now as far as I am concerned that particular Section is highly objectionable and obnoxious and it should have no place…in any body of laws that we might pass. The sooner we get rid of it the better.” Invoking the law to silence activists, journalists and cartoonists and further bolstering the code with a draconian IT act is an exhibition of unmitigated arrogance on our government’s part, not to mention the callous defenestration of historical prescription to do otherwise.

He follows this confession with an audacious challenge:

“I do not ask for mercy. I do not plead any extenuating act. I am here, therefore, to invite and cheerfully submit to the highest penalty that can be inflicted upon me for what in law is a deliberate crime, and what appears to me to be the highest duty of a citizen. The only course open to you, the Judge, is, as I am going to say in my statement, either to resign your post, or inflict on me the severest penalty if you believe that the system and law you are assisting to administer are good for the people.”

When I read this the first time, I paused in feverish retreat. Here was a scrawny little malnourished Indian, attacking the British oligarchy with nothing less elegant than sardonic articulation, questioning their deepest moral integrity, if any was present at all. Contrast this arresting grade of conviction with today’s unimaginative politically correct equivocation. Few politicians speak with an emphasis on morality, fewer of these are morally upright. The business of preserving and revealing the truth is now, rather overwhelmingly, in the hands of our journalists, who are unfortunately in the hands of our politicians. Of the handful who deny and defy such complicity, one has resuscitated my hope to the brink of optimism- Palagummi Sainath. Here’s his view on the dismal state of our media:

“"It’s not like we’re the good guys and the readers are so crude" - That’s an argument a drug peddler could make: “I’m a decent guy, it's these assholes on the street who want the stuff!” I don’t believe this for a moment! If patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel, what the reader “wants” is the last refuge of every intellectually bankrupt editor known!”

The polemical tone of Sainath (assholes, intellectually bankrupt), I contend, is simply a different style of provocation, much like the affected humility (cheerfully submit, deliberate crime) of Gandhi. These cancel out to reveal inescapable truths; both call a spade a spade in very different ways. As a society, the onus is on us, to rectify our aptitude to read past such ornaments and repellents that can take us to every exalted place but the truth. (A parallel but less pressing inquiry: can I confidently insist that my readers require no such training?)

Gandhi proceeds to summarize a bit of History which I choose not to abridge for two distinguishing reasons: 1) it tells us much about the growth of the man, 2) it is an honest admission of the past which by today’s tendencies to trash, would serve as rich fodder for alleging complicity and treason:

"My public life began in 1893 in South Africa in troubled weather. My first contact with British authority in that country was not of a happy character. I discovered that as a man and an Indian, I had no rights. More correctly I discovered that I had no rights as a man because I was an Indian.But I was not baffled. I thought that this treatment of Indians was an excrescence upon a system that was intrinsically and mainly good. I gave the Government my voluntary and hearty co-operation, criticizing it freely where I felt it was faulty but never wishing its destruction.Consequently when the existence of the Empire was threatened in 1899 by the Boer challenge, I offered my services to it, raised a volunteer ambulance corps and served at several actions that took place for the relief of Ladysmith. Similarly in 1906, at the time of the Zulu ‘revolt’, I raised a stretcher bearer party and served till the end of the ‘rebellion’. On both the occasions I received medals and was even mentioned in dispatches. For my work in South Africa I was given by Lord Hardinge a Kaisar-i-Hind gold medal. When the war broke out in 1914 between England and Germany, I raised a volunteer ambulance corps in London, consisting of the then resident Indians in London, chiefly students. Its work was acknowledged by the authorities to be valuable. Lastly, in India when a special appeal was made at the war Conference in Delhi in 1918 by Lord Chelmsford for recruits, I struggled at the cost of my health to raise a corps in Kheda, and the response was being made when the hostilities ceased and orders were received that no more recruits were wanted. In all these efforts at service, I was actuated by the belief that it was possible by such services to gain a status of full equality in the Empire for my countrymen."

This can be read as either a self-centered nationalistic rationale or an apology for traitorship to the global anti-imperialist struggle; there are still ruffled feathers over such interpretations (that 'revolt' and 'rebellion' are within quotes gives me good reason to believe the latter). But we can be sure that Gandhi was no fool and accepted the logical consequences of what he said. How many of our parliamentary representatives own up to mistakes, confess inner conflicts and accept responsibility for the ills of society? But it begs the question: how many of their electors share any of these traits? Are we setting impossibly high standards by quoting Gandhi? Quite the contrary! If History makes any difference, as we claim it does, we should aspire to making Gandhi’s standards the bare minimum! Conveying my honesty in saying this becomes especially tedious when addressing those who prefix Gandhi’s name with the inordinately lofty title ‘Mahatma’. Elevating a man to such an eminence generally tends to render him and his ideals elusive to both adoption and scrutiny. It also leads to missing crucial ironies in the man’s life: He intended harmony among Hindus and Muslims but insisted  that his disciples chant “Raghupathi Raghava RajaRam” in gatherings and marches. He dismissed western education but articulated supremely in English. He stood for the poor but decided that burning produce was symbolically worthier. He spoke of women’s rights but denied his own dying wife penicillin. He vehemently opposed free market ideas but is on every inflating rupee note worldwide! These are the makings of a man, not a saint, and as Kamal Hassan portrays in his magnum opus ‘Hey Ram’, we do the man, and ourselves, a great injustice by deifying him.

And now comes the true thrust of the speech, an excerpt that can sit by itself and still say all that has to be said:

“I came reluctantly to the conclusion that the British connection had made India more helpless than she ever was before, politically and economically. A disarmed India has no power of resistance against any aggressor if she wanted to engage, in an armed conflict with him. So much is this the case that some of our best men consider that India must take generations, before she can achieve Dominion Status. She has become so poor that she has little power of resisting famines. Before the British advent India spun and wove in her millions of cottages, just the supplement she needed for adding to her meager agricultural resources. This cottage industry, so vital for India’s existence, has been ruined by incredibly heartless and inhuman processes as described by English witness. Little do town dwellers know how the semi-starved masses of India are slowly sinking to lifelessness. Little do they know that their miserable comfort represents the brokerage they get for their work they do for the foreign exploiter, that the profits and the brokerage are sucked from the masses. Little do they realize that the Government established by law in British India is carried on for this exploitation of the masses. No sophistry, no jugglery in figures, can explain away the evidence that the skeletons in many villages present to the naked eye...The law itself in this country has been used to serve the foreign exploiter...In my opinion, the administration of the law is thus prostituted, consciously or unconsciously, for the benefit of the exploiter."

Now, simply reread that only this time removing the word ‘British’ and letting ‘the’ refer to mass-globalization/crony-capitalism/UPA-government. Here is an excerpt from Sainath’s collection of rural surveys and reports titled ‘Everybody loves a good drought’:

“A profoundly undemocratic streak runs through India’s development process. Exclusion doesn’t end at the symposia. Peasants are excluded from land issues in real life too.Villagers are increasingly robbed of control over water and other community resources. Tribes are being more and more cut off from the forests and their experiences in contempt.Real development would involve the transformation of the human state to a higher level of being and living. Almost all versions of development accept that. However, such a transformation must have the participation and consent of those affected by it. Their involvement in the decision-making process. And the intrusion on their environment, culture, livelihood and tradition by that process should be minimal.But that sounds too much like work. So you can have a play staged and enacted with all the main actors sitting in the audience- if they are around at all. If reality smells, rewrite the script. Take the current champions of ‘change’. Those shouting loudest about change among the elite are the very people who ran this country for over forty years. If it is in a mess, they had much to do with it.”
When asked about how people can be so insensitive to suffering, he charges our journalists' and readers' inability to make connections. For instance, an eagerly anticipated fashion show and a sudden rise in the suicide rate of cotton farmers is a spatial connection hardly unlike the temporal connections we've been discussing.

Gandhi again:

“The greater misfortune is that the Englishmen and their Indian associates in the administration of the country do not know that they are engaged in the crime I have attempted to describe. I am satisfied that many Englishmen and Indian officials honestly believe that they are administering one of the best systems devised in the world, and that India is making steady, though, slow progress. They do not know, a subtle but effective system of terrorism and an organized display of force on the one hand, and the deprivation of all powers of retaliation or self-defence on the other, as emasculated the people and induced in them the habit of simulation. This awful habit has added to the ignorance and the self-deception of the administrators”

Jayprakash Narayan of the Lok Satta party presents, well above the “corrupted souls of men” argument, a more intelligent and progressive thesis, namely that our institutions/systems allow and encourage seemingly "victimless corruption" (Coal-Gate, Arms-Gate, 2G) among the “amorphous whole”. Decentralization of power, incentivizing vigilant reporting, eliminating old electoral practices and exercising swift prosecution are solutions that don’t require you to be a political scientist to understand. But acknowledging that these are even possible requires a more sympathetic stance- our politicians are who we churn out from our institutions, who are elected by vote-banks that comprise us. If our criticism degenerates to cynicism, if we unanimously become anti-establishment, we must always remember, as Narayan puts it, that “we are the establishment!”

Gandhi proceeds to point out the obvious inequity of Section 124A:

“Section 124 A, under which I am happily charged, is perhaps the prince among the political sections of the Indian Penal Code designed to suppress the liberty of the citizen. Affection cannot be manufactured or regulated by law. If one has no affection for a person or system, one should be free to give the fullest expression to his disaffection, so long as he does not contemplate, promote, or incite to violence. But the section under which mere promotion of disaffection is a crime. I have studied some of the cases tried under it; I know that some of the most loved of India’s patriots have been convicted under it. I consider it a privilege, therefore, to be charged under that section.”

And here is Sainath's lament today:

"As early as in 1893, Reuters assigned a correspondent, S.H.S.Merewether, to cover the famine-hit districts of this country. Apart from his reports, this resulted in a book, A Tour through the Famine Districts of India. In it, he wrote that his assignment came about after a request Her Majesty's Government had made to Reuters. The Raj, among other things, wanted to counter the riffraff of the nationalist press. The Reuters man stood up for the Raj. Denouncing the Indian press for its 'sedition', he wrote that 'a censorship of the native press would not only be expedient, but seems an absolute necessity.'It seems extraordinary that so miniscule a press should have had such an impact. More than a hundred years later, a much larger press has failed to do the same. Issues crucial to hundreds of millions of Indians demand its attention. But it has not put the government on the mat."

One can see clearly how history remixes itself. Any further commentary would be patronizing to those who grasp this point and useless to those who haven't.

Santayana's famous warning is part of a larger body of work titled 'The Life of Reason'. It appears in this much more scathing paragraph on mankind:

"Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. When change is absolute there remains no being to improve and no direction is set for possible improvement: and when experience is not retained, as among savages, infancy is perpetual. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. In the first stage of life the mind is frivolous and easily distracted; it misses progress by failing in consecutiveness and persistence. This is the condition of children and barbarians, in whom instinct has learned nothing from experience. In a second stage men are docile to events, plastic to new habits and suggestions, yet able to graft them on original instincts, which they thus bring to fuller satisfaction. This is the plane of manhood and true progress. Last comes a stage when retentiveness is exhausted and all that happens is at once forgotten; a vain, because unpractical, repetition of the past takes the place of plasticity and fertile readaptation. In a moving world readaptation is the price of longevity. The hard shell, far from protecting the vital principle, condemns it to die down slowly and be gradually chilled; immortality in such a case must have been secured earlier, by giving birth to a generation plastic to the contemporary world and able to retain its lessons. Thus old age is as forgetful as youth, and more incorrigible; it displays the same inattentiveness to conditions; its memory becomes self-repeating and degenerates into an instinctive reaction, like a bird's chirp."

Keep reading...